09-27-2016, 09:46 PM
(09-27-2016, 08:40 PM)K-Man Wrote: didn't watch it, but yesterday afternoon while sitting in an airport they had CNN on (*gag*) and the way they were hyping the debate was so blatantly pro-Clinton that I knew she would juggernaut that debate. Ever since Bernie conceded to her (im still mad btw) I knew that the gubmint already chose her to be the next president, no matter how popular The Donald is.
Your vote does not matter, and hasn't in a long time. Hillary Clinton will win this election, it has already been decided by the jackoffs that shadowrun this bullshit nation. I'd bet my life on it.
I watched it through Washington Post and they were pretty level about things. Now the farce is clear for anyone with the slightest interpretation skills, but within the scope of "one or the other" it became pretty clear to me why most media is turning to Clinton. Even the Economist is pro-Clinton, god. But there's no comparison. She is so far out of his league, the debate was like an exercise in twilight zone nonsense.
People are now going about how the debate was "close", how Trump was "winning at first" but Clinton "took the lead". Don't bullshit me. How ideologically blind do you have to be to not see how proficient she is vs him? There is no way that in a "him or her" situation you would pick him. For the debate, let alone for presidency.
I mean I already pointed out the different sides of mindfuckery that is to see him standing there. It's like some sort of an elaborate joke, like reddit andd 4chan banded together to create the perfect shitstorm, the troll to end all politics. Which, you know, would be amazing if it were the case. And to see him capable of being there, standing head to head with a political steamroller the likes of Hillary Clinton, is something out of a crazy dream.

