11-16-2016, 03:15 AM
(11-16-2016, 03:08 AM)shagg Wrote:(11-16-2016, 03:00 AM)Ben Wrote: second statement: another way to deflect responsibility. "ha ha we are all jokin here right gang?"
(11-16-2016, 02:52 AM)shagg Wrote: literally were arguing if I have a right to an opinion...
y'all are just triggered
nobody is saying you dont, but if you think the opinion "you guys are just liberals LOL" can fly by without any recourse then we have a right to tell you it's stupid
ive written like 3 long replies now and you want to bicker with niki, say "bitch", type in all caps, etc. you dont answer to anything
I havent answered to you yet because Niki has good bait, that's true
and then your bolded statement doesnt even address itself or Tempest's opinion... you just think what I said was snobby ok
and im using liberal just as flippantly as Niki is using reactionary (sense a motif??). maybe no one actually care's about Niki's opinions and I've been handling this all wrong but I thought she was kind of relevant
yes the motif is "i can do a bad thing because i feel someone else is doing a bad thing" and its gross. why not be the better person? also, why should i care what you have to say if you're here to take bait and be audacious rather than make good points? why should i bother trying to make good points if you're just here to have a slapfight?
i think what you said is snobby because you had plenty of options but, from what i understand you refused to choose "either". there is a paradox, in life, which is that many individuals make up the whole. you yourself make up a tiny percentage of the whole, but if everyone in the whole felt this way then there would be no whole.
by saying "im not going to vote", you are in essence saying that you are more important than a cog in the whole. if everyone felt this way, nobody would vote. the tone of your message is, "im too good to vote". i then pointed out that, your statement about "either" is irrelevant because there were three other candidates in your state. you would have to really not like any of them to not vote against your conscience. not voting against your conscience is admirable, and i agree, but you must realize that we arent going to be able to vote with our conscience if we reinforce this two-party monopoly which is what you do repeatedly by calling people liberals, saying you couldnt vote for "either", and etc
in that way i disagree with tony. one can not vote and have an opinion, however, you ought to have a good reason for not voting. you do not
