Trump's 100 Days

[shagg]

yea because refusing to buy chinese goods TOTALLY wont have any effect on our relationship w china, right?

[fat lesbian]

I SAID WE ARENT GONNA DO ABOUT IT BECAUSE THERES NOTHING NOT FUCKBRAINED MORONIC THAT CAN BE DONE LMMMFFFAAOOO JESUS CHRIST DUDE!
there's a reason we haven't done anything yet!
1. the us is a currency manipulator!!
2. we can't replace chinese goods with goods of our own!
the fact that it would further strain relations was an afterthought holy fuck

[shagg]

btw.... the us is a currency manipulator too.... what happens if they threaten to cut off all exports to us until WE stop?

[fat lesbian]

of course u would quote one of the posts after instead of the original post addressing it. because u don't know shit u fucking idiot

[shagg]

my point here is that you have offer one solution, maybe you know more but im only seeing :
- embargo
- where would we get chinese goods?

[fat lesbian]

but yes ur soooo much smarter than all the people who realized that there's nothing that can be effectively done about it... that's why u work in the White House, right??

[shagg]

Im not even sure if all your shit is here, im just scrolling thru dude lol

[risbolla]

now kiss !!!

[shagg]

but yes ur soooo much smarter than all the people who realized that there's nothing that can be effectively done about it... that's why u work in the White House, right??

you missed my point about Apple.

there's even people inside the US that want to keep things easy on China, but maybe that's not a good thing

[fat lesbian]

clearly u and donald "i have literally no relevant experience" trump have Cracked the Code despite everyone else saying his ideas are useless and have no substance

[Relaps]

@shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg

[fat lesbian]

we don't have even close to equal value in reciprocal goods when u consider almost everything we export to china is luxury products

[Relaps]

I noticed that a lot of the points you like to have contention over are regarding economic issues and foreign trade issues - with you boasting about a biz econ degree, i think you just wanted to seem like the smart guy and prove us all inferior

Ill wrap up why I think you lost, on Business at least... (Foreign Affairs is almost 90% business so thats why you might lose that one too)

yep

[shagg]

@shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg @shagg

i see u, you wrote a lot. like too much. 

i think your stuff is in the right place for points that are abstract and vague (executive orders, term limits, etc) because we as the ppl havent seen enough to know how he will define

but without addressing every point with what I agree with or not, i think the highlights that I disagree:

- I think NAFTA is bad for blue collar US. you seem on the fence with it. It's the main bit of Trump's campaign rhetoric, but manufacturers are still leaving for mexico and not having any re-training for employees into different positions... just up, moved and fired

- Keystone Pipeline/Fossil Fuel dereg: i disagree a little. It was Obama's promise to make the US 100% oil-independent by 2020 (?), and IDK how we're gonna do that unless we open up some of these channels. Not all of them, but some. 

- I think any attempt at controlling lobbying in Washington is a good thing, both foreign and non. It will be difficult because some people are "consultants" and "advisors", but achieve the same thing. Foreign Lobbying will be easier to identify, but obviously diplomacy is a form of lobbying so i think this should be only when it comes to business affairs.

[shagg]

I noticed that a lot of the points you like to have contention over are regarding economic issues and foreign trade issues - with you boasting about a biz econ degree, i think you just wanted to seem like the smart guy and prove us all inferior

play to your strengths 
it was Ben's claiming of Xenophobia in a couple business points that made me jump in, so that's been my angle this whole time sorry