![]() |
|
us election thread - Printable Version +- The Spame Forum Experience (https://forums.spamerica.net) +-- Forum: Bird-Related Discussion (https://forums.spamerica.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: No-Spin Zone (https://forums.spamerica.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Thread: us election thread (/showthread.php?tid=204) |
RE: us election thread - grue - 10-01-2016 this http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2016/09/29/dont-vote-for-donald-trump-editorial-board-editorials-debates/91295020/ absolutely this RE: us election thread - Gorilla Tits - 10-01-2016 http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2016/09/29/mike-pence-donald-trump-editorials-debates/91295074/ RE: us election thread - grue - 10-01-2016 (10-01-2016, 10:31 PM)Gorilla Tits Wrote: http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2016/09/29/mike-pence-donald-trump-editorials-debates/91295074/ ![]() huh RE: us election thread - Relaps - 10-02-2016 Come the fuck on RE: us election thread - K-Man - 10-02-2016 Wait, weren't they blatantly anti-Trump like yesterday? what the actual fuck kind of election is this RE: us election thread - Gorilla Tits - 10-02-2016 They are quite obviously anti-trump. They published an opinion piece from Donald Trump's campaign I guess to play devil's advocate. I like that they did that actually. RE: us election thread - Ben - 10-02-2016 its his vice presidential pick. the first article: "literally us, the staff of this otherwise fairly impartial news outlet, are telling you he is fucked up" the second article: "but we will let the vice presidential candidate give you an alternative (yet shitty and unclear) opinion on it" mike pence doesnt... work for usa today. its the same as a university inviting a speaker they dont wholly agree with to speak even if they as the administration have said officially they disagree RE: us election thread - grue - 10-02-2016 guys really there shouldn't be a need to stress out the difference between an editorial piece and an opinion column RE: us election thread - grue - 10-02-2016 I guess this may be weird in american media because you guys have the whole polarized "we are liberal!" "we are conservative!" thing with different news outlet but I do think any self-respecting media outlet should have radically different ranges of perspectivs in the opinion section; it's fairly common around these parts (though not as encompassing as i wished it would be) obviously there are lines to be drawn, like no overtly racist things, but the rest should be free game and let the reader be the judge RE: us election thread - grue - 10-06-2016 RE: us election thread - grue - 10-09-2016 never called that it would end with a who's the biggest women abuser argument and yet here we are RE: us election thread - Gorilla Tits - 10-09-2016 Hope everyone's ready for 4 years of President Hillary Clinton. At least she has political experience, and seen it first hand for 8 years before then. RE: us election thread - grue - 10-09-2016 i love that his defence was "well SHE'S married to an ACTUAL mollester!!" what a guy RE: us election thread - Gorilla Tits - 10-09-2016 I don't think it's molesting when it's consensual RE: us election thread - GeorgeBubbinzInSpace - 10-09-2016 would you consider yourself an expert on the matter |